SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING RESILIENCE IN WARTIME UKRAINE: VISIBILITY, PRESERVATION, AND THE LEGITIMACY OF THE SCHOLARLY RECORD

Berezko, Oleksandr; Kotyk, Taras; Kharlamova, Ganna; Tolstanova, Ganna; Yaroshenko, Tetyana; Drach, Iryna; Suchikova, Yana

doi:10.5281/zenodo.22009866

SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING RESILIENCE IN WARTIME UKRAINE: VISIBILITY, PRESERVATION, AND THE LEGITIMACY OF THE SCHOLARLY RECORD

Тип публікації :

Препринт

Дата випуску :

18 серпня 2026 р.

Автор(и) :

Berezko, Oleksandr

Kotyk, Taras

Kharlamova, Ganna

Tolstanova, Ganna

Yaroshenko, Tetyana

Drach, Iryna

Suchikova, Yana

Мова основного тексту :

Англійська

eKNUTSHIR URL :

https://ir.library.knu.ua/handle/15071834/34339

DOI :

10.5281/zenodo.22009866

Цитування :

[APA 7] Berezko, O., Kotyk, T., Kharlamova, G., Tolstanova, G., Yaroshenko, T., Drach, I., & Suchikova, Y. (2026). SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING RESILIENCE IN WARTIME UKRAINE: VISIBILITY, PRESERVATION, AND THE LEGITIMACY OF THE SCHOLARLY RECORD. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22009866

[ДСТУ] SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING RESILIENCE IN WARTIME UKRAINE: VISIBILITY, PRESERVATION, AND THE LEGITIMACY OF THE SCHOLARLY RECORD / O. Berezko et al. 2026. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22009866 (date of access: 11.09.2026).

This article conceptualises scholarly publishing as an infrastructure of legitimacy that ensures the verifiability, governability, and preservation of the scholarly record. Drawing on infrastructure theory, it proposes analysing the fragility of publishing systems through three interconnected dimensions: technical, human capacity, and governance. Using wartime Ukraine as an analytical context, the article demonstrates how publication visibility may coexist with the weakening of infrastructural conditions necessary for maintaining legitimacy. The analysis identifies a gap between visibility and legitimacy, in which systems preserve outward continuity while gradually losing capacities related to preservation, editorial labour, and governance. The article further outlines key infrastructural conditions of resilience, including preservation and portability of the scholarly record, reproducible editorial capacity, procedural governability, and custodial sovereignty. It argues that resilience should be understood not as technical continuity alone, but as the capacity of publishing systems to reproduce the conditions under which scholarly knowledge remains reliable and institutionally controlled. The manuscript concludes by discussing the implications of this perspective for science policy and international scholarly infrastructures.

Файл(и) :

Завантажити

Формат :

Adobe PDF

Розмір :

250.12 KB

Контрольна сума :

(MD5):39129dec5aed5e00db97524292e64c23

Якщо не вказано інше, ця робота розповсюджується на умовах ліцензії Attribution 4.0 International