Глинська, Н.ВН.ВГлинська2026-06-182026-06-182016-02-21Глинська, Н. (2016). The gradation of quality of criminal procedural decisions: theory and practice.. Вісник кримінального судочинства(1), 11–18.https://ir.library.knu.ua/handle/15071834/24101The article is devoted to the problem of the quality of criminal procedural decisions (СPD).Depending on the degree, that CPD fulfill with the corresponding normative prescriptions (highquality standards) it should be allocated to such level of quality CPR: good-quality; sufficiently highquality; satisfactory quality; partly poor quality; quite poor quality.The fairness seems as more correct criterion of substantial violations made while making thefinal CPD. The fairness is complex estimated concept that integrates the overall meaningful qualityof CPD. This requires a balanced approach to the estimating of committed violations from the angleof their possible impact on the overall fairness of the final decision on the case (method «fairness ofthe proceeding taken as a whole»).Estimating of CPD quality by certain procedural participators on different stages and choosingappropriate responses in case of any quality defects should be given from the angle their harmfulfor the rights and legitimate interests of the trial participators and the other tasks of the criminalproceedings.Violations of corresponding normative prescriptions are significant in a case of making certainharm or a threat of harm for the rights and legitimate interests of participators, including due legalprocedure, other tasks of the proceedings, particularly an effective investigation or trial. Enoughflexible is minimum limit of CPD fulfill with the corresponding illegal standards, without which it isimpossible to admit due legal quality of the act. It is noted that current criminal procedural legislationdoes not provide exhaustive criteria for the implementation of the CPD check perfect in terms of itslegal definition quality, the latter should be the subject of further research of science.У статті розглянута проблема якісної визначеності кримінальних процесуальних рішень. Автором доведено теоретичну необхідність та практичну значущість виділення таких рівнів якості кримінальних процесуальних рішень: доброякісність; достатньо висока якість; задовільна якість; частково незадовільна якість та повністю незадовільна (неприйнятна) якістьukthe degrees of qualitygood qualityqualityqualityprocedural decisionsquality standards\quality standardsthe person adopting decisionsрівні якостідоброякісністьякістькримінальні процесульні рішеннястандарти доброякісностіособащо приймає рішення.Стаття