Шило, О.Г.О.Г.Шило2026-06-182026-06-182015-01-23Шило, О. (2015). General description of the procedural indications as sources of evidence in crim-inal proceedings. Вісник кримінального судочинства(1), 151–156.https://ir.library.knu.ua/handle/15071834/24219This paper examines the norms Code of Ukraine, which define the concept of testimony in crim-inal proceedings as evidence of procedural sources, types, ways to check and assess the features. Attention is paid to those innovations legislation requiring scientific understanding and interpretation. It is noted that the law does not distinguish between certain types of readings depending on the procedural status of the entity from which they are derived, because of the same legal nature of this source of evidence. Of particular note, the author gives hearsay evidence. Use as evidence in a crim-inal trial testimony hearsay exception to the general rule regarding personal perception of the facts by the person giving the testimony, because in this case the possible distortion of information received in any doubt as to its authenticity, the influence of the subjective factor, which reduces its credibility. It is noted that the methodological paradigm shift that occurs in connection with the adoption of the new Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, has shaped the legal regulation of the use in proving evidence Keywords: evidence; procedural sources of evidence; indications; hearsay evidence; assessment of evidenceВ статті аналізуються норми КПК України, які визначають поняття показань в кримінальному провадженні як процесуальних джерел доказів, їх види, способи перевірки та особливості оцінки. Звертається увага на ті новації законодавства, які потребують наукового осмислення та тлумачення. Ключові слова: докази, процесуальні джерела доказів, показання, показання з чужих слів, оцінка доказів.ukСтаття