Старенький, О.СО.ССтаренький2026-06-182026-06-182016-02-21Старенький, О. (2016). Criminal procedural guarantees of the defender as a subject of proving at carrying covert investigation (search) action. Вісник кримінального судочинства(1), 146–153.https://ir.library.knu.ua/handle/15071834/24119On the basis of the analysis of the current provisions of the criminal procedure law of Ukrainematerial practices and surveys of practical workers, author of the article considers the problematicissues of realization the criminal procedural guarantees of the defender as a subject of proving atcarrying covert investigation (search) action. It is noted that the decision conduct of the secret investigation(search) actions should take no investigator or prosecutor. This obligation should be entrustedto investigating judge.Substantiated that declassify be only those materials that have been received on the results ofthe secret investigation (search) actions (minutes of the secret investigation (search) actions and therelevant their annexes), while the decision on which conducted of the secret investigation (search)actions (resolution investigator, prosecutor of the secret investigation (search) actions, decision investigatingjudge for permission of the secret investigation (search) actions) are not subject to declassify.It should be noted that the existence of this legislative gap leads to the fact that the defendersdenied the opportunity verify and assess the legality and validity of the secret investigation (search)actions, the legitimacy of limiting the rights and freedoms of their clients during of the secret investigation(search) actions and protocols of the secret investigation (search) actions – as admissible andproper evidences in pre-trial investigation.It is noted that the criminal proceedings must be available procedural decision on which conductedthe secret investigation (search) actions (resolution investigator, prosecutor of the secret investigation(search) actions, decision investigating judge for permission of the secret investigation(search) actions) and request of the secret investigation (search) actions, of which the establishedorder authorized persons filmed secrecy stamp. Appropriate secrecy stamp should be removed orafter conducted the secret investigation (search) actions or before the opening of materials of criminalproceedings to another party (art. 290 CPC of Ukraine)На підставі проведеного аналізу положень чинного кримінального процесуального законодавства України, матеріалів практики, а також опитування практичних працівників, автором статті розглядаються проблемні питання реалізації кримінальних процесуальних гарантій захисника як суб’єкта доказування при проведенні негласних слідчих (розшукових) дій.ukdefendersecret investigation (search) actionsprovingevidencepre-trial investigationguaranteesзахисникнегласні слідчі (розшукові) діїдосудове розслідуваннядоказдоказуваннягарантіїСтаття