Панова, А.ВА.ВПанова2026-06-182026-06-182016-02-21Панова, А. (2016). Problem issues of the evaluation of the admissibility of evidence obtained from conducting covert investigative (search) actions in criminal proceedings. Вісник кримінального судочинства(1), 132–139.https://ir.library.knu.ua/handle/15071834/24117The article is devoted to the problem issues of the evaluation of the admissibility of evidence obtainedfrom conducting covert investigative (search) actions, particularly as regards the grounds, methodsand legitimacy restriction of rights and freedoms of an individual, against whom an undeclared activitiesare carried out. The author examines the peculiarities of the legal nature of such acts and reveals theissues that arise in practice in recognizing evidence of the results of covert investigative (search) actions.The article focuses on problem issues of the application of the CPC code of Ukraine, in particular,Chapter 21, which defines the system and procedures of covert investigative (search) actions.The features of evaluation of the admissibility of results of covert investigative (search) actions areexamined by using the examples of certain judgments and procedural situations. Attention is drawnto the issue of procedural declassification of documents that are the basis for the covert investigative(search) actions and provide for review of the defense and the court, which is important for assessingobtaining evidence. Also, the problem of the admissibility of evidence of the crime of minor or mediumgravity received from the results of the covert investigative (search) actions in criminal proceedings,registered the fact of committing grave or especially grave crime are considered. Technology featuresof some secret investigative (search) actions, which, in particular, are in need for complex followingseveral decisions of the investigating judge and the prosecutor`s resolution, which are legal groundsfor their conduct.Стаття присвячена питанням оцінки допустимості фактичних даних, отриманих у результаті проведення негласних слідчих (розшукових) дій, зокрема, в частині підстав, методів та законності обмеження прав і свобод особи, щодо якої здійснюється негласна діяльність. Автор досліджує особливості правової природи таких дій, а також розкриває проблемні питання, які виникають на практиці під час визнання доказами результатів негласних слідчих (розшукових) дій.ukevidenceevaluation of evidenceadmissibilitycovert investigative (search) actionsдоказиоцінка доказівдопустимістьнегласні слідчі (розшукові) діїСтаття